Gameye vs. Hathora
Games-First Platform vs. AI Pivot Startup
Games-First Platform vs. AI Pivot Startup
Gameye is a managed orchestration platform built exclusively for multiplayer games. Started hosting games in 2019.
It provides:
Hathora started as a YC-backed game server hosting platform in 2023.
It provides:
But recent developments raise questions:
Here’s a breakdown of the key differences between Gameye and Hathora:
| Feature | Gameye | Hathora |
|---|---|---|
| Company Focus | 100% games | Games + AI inference |
| Track Record | 7 years, 120M+ sessions | ~3 years, limited public data |
| Container Start Time | 0.5 seconds | “Seconds” (nodes: under 2 min) |
| Egress Fees | None (included) | Yes (per GB) |
| Pricing Transparency | Capacity-based, clear | “Schedule a call” |
| Infrastructure | Multi-provider (bare metal + cloud) | Cloud + bare metal option |
| Anti-DDoS | Included (Gcore, OVHCloud) | Included |
| Failover | Automatic cross-provider | Single provider per region |
In November 2025, Hathora launched models.hathora.dev—an AI inference platform for voice agents, ASR, TTS, and LLMs. Their blog now features posts like “A Deep Dive into LLM Inference Latencies.”
This isn’t necessarily bad—but it raises questions for game studios:
Gameye has one business: multiplayer game infrastructure. Our roadmap, our engineering, and our support are 100% focused on helping studios ship games. No side projects. No distractions.
Doborog Games reduced server costs by over 60% after switching to Gameye.
“It’s reassuring to know that we could scale up indefinitely as we prepare for platform events and sales.”
— Brian Jordan, Co-founder & CTO, Doborog Games
Chivalry 2 launched with 250,000 players in the first 30 minutes—zero infrastructure downtime.
“We felt there was a personal relationship, and if there was a problem, we knew Gameye would be there.”
— Rasmus Löfström, Game Director, Torn Banner Studios
Hathora still offers game server hosting, but their strategic direction has shifted. Their homepage now emphasizes “compute orchestration across GPUs and CPUs,” and they’ve launched an AI inference platform. Gaming is now one of multiple use cases rather than their sole focus.
Yes. Hathora charges for egress bandwidth in addition to vCPU usage. Their documentation mentions “Egress (GB) per player” as a billing factor. Gameye includes all data transfer in its capacity-based pricing.
Gameye starts new containers in 0.5 seconds on average. Hathora’s documentation states their autoscaler “spins up nodes in under 2 minutes.” For sudden player spikes, this difference can impact player experience.
All startups carry some risk. Hathora is VC-backed (YC, $7.6M raised), which means they need to grow—and pivots happen when growth stalls. Their AI pivot may signal where they see their future. Gameye has been operating profitably for 7 years with 120M+ sessions, focused solely on games.
Yes. Both platforms are container-based, so migration is straightforward. Your Docker images work on Gameye with minimal changes. Our team can help you run both platforms in parallel during transition.
We strive to maintain technical, fair, and current comparisons. If you spot any inaccuracies or have suggestions, please contact us. We value your perspective and insights to improve our content.
Last updated: January 26, 2026